Search for: "King v. State Of Ohio" Results 1 - 20 of 352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Perhaps it would have been more like King Kong meets Lenin in October. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
  State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm by Orin S. Kerr
It has recognized that a search occurs whether the particular method employed by the government entails a "compelled surgical intrusion into an individual's body" (Winston v Lee, 470 US 753, 759 [1985]; see Schmerber, 384 US at 767); "gentle" or "light" contact with the body (see Maryland v King, 569 US 435, 446 [2013]); "brief" contact with "outer clothing" (Terry v Ohio, 392 US 1, 24-25 [1968]);… [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Ohio 2021) (finding consequences of pending medical-school disciplinary proceeding neither "certain" nor "immediate"); Doe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]