Search for: "King v. State Of Ohio"
Results 1 - 20
of 352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Perhaps it would have been more like King Kong meets Lenin in October. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
State court analogues to these rules replicated the debate in state courts around the country. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Judge King concurred separately. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Ohio? [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Davis II Chair in Law Emeritus The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law David A. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 1:39 pm
It has recognized that a search occurs whether the particular method employed by the government entails a "compelled surgical intrusion into an individual's body" (Winston v Lee, 470 US 753, 759 [1985]; see Schmerber, 384 US at 767); "gentle" or "light" contact with the body (see Maryland v King, 569 US 435, 446 [2013]); "brief" contact with "outer clothing" (Terry v Ohio, 392 US 1, 24-25 [1968]);… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 1:34 pm
Under Terry v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
Mary Ziegler is the Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
Quoting its 1978 opinion in TVA v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
, Best v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 7:50 am
State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:35 am
Ohio 2021) (finding consequences of pending medical-school disciplinary proceeding neither "certain" nor "immediate"); Doe v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:36 am
The Court, in its recently published opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
Ohio, 495 U.S. 103, 110 (1990) (likewise); United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]