Search for: "Kwan v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
Professor Kate Sang has received £15,000 after the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Michelle Donelan, wrongly accused her of supporting Hamas. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Mr Palmer argues comments made by Mr McGowan in 2020, which included calling him an “enemy” of the state, damaged his reputation. [read post]
25 May 2019, 10:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This comment continues a pattern of behavior that led to our first public reprimand of Judge Kwan, following his in-court reference to sexual conduct and a former president of the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Government has published its much-awaited White Paper on “The Future of the Relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union”. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has turned down BuzzFeed’s request to move a libel case over its publication of a dossier containing unverified allegations against President Donald Trump to New York from Florida. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
United States A federal judge has turned down BuzzFeed’s request to move a libel case over its publication of a dossier containing unverified allegations against President Donald Trump to New York from Florida. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am by INFORRM
In the case of Pui Kwan Kay v Ming Pao Holdings [2015] HKCA 540 the Court of Appeal allowed the defendant’s appeal in a libel case brought by the vice-chairman of the Hong Kong Football Association after the Court of Appeal ruled the paper made its comments in the public interest. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that a criminal defendant whose assets have been frozen before his trial has no right to a pre-trial hearing to challenge the probable cause for his indictment, even if he needs the frozen funds to pay for his defense. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:15 am by gmlevine
Chris Kwan, D2003-0920 (WIPO January 20, 2004), for example, the Respondent contended that the Complainant had lost or abandoned trademark rights in the United States or Canada. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 3:29 pm
Freedus responded by referring to a Fifth Circuit case (United States v. [read post]