Search for: "LANE v. USA"
Results 1 - 20
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
On 14 November 2023, Lane J heard an application in the case of Payone GmbH v Logo KB-2023-002134. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Such laws have withstood judicial challenge in large part because Congress has granted states the authority to impose such restrictions—to effectively legislate their own foreign policy in this narrow lane.[4] However, as of yet, Congress has not authorized the same powers to states regarding dealings with China or some of the other foreign states that these bills frequently address, such as Russia, Venezuela, and others. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:47 am
” As best I can tell, there are now exactly seven appeals court decisions from three of the four Departments of the Appellate Division explicitly adopting this rule of construction of contract indemnification provisions to cover intra-party disputes unless otherwise specified in the agreement: In re Part 60 RMBS Put – Back Litig.WSA Group, PE., PC v DKI Eng’g & Consulting USA PC (178 AD3d 1320 [3d Dept 2019])Crown Wisteria, Inc. v Cibani (178… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Republican Governors Gave Lucrative, No-Bid COVID-19 Deals to Utah Firms, Who Then Gave $1M to GOP Campaigns Yahoo News – Craig Harris, Bailey Schulz, and Katie Wedell (USA Today) | Published: 7/27/2022 A small number of companies leveraged their connections to sign deals to provide COVID-19 tests and personal protective equipment that would pay them at least $219 million in five GOP-led states. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:35 am
" (Cox, 30-31) (quoting Advanta USA, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:52 pm
Lane, 67 F. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 9:50 am
The FJA should stay in its lane. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am
First up is Lucky Brand Dungarees v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 4:25 am
[FN1] Accordingly, this aspect of plaintiff’s indemnification claim should not have been dismissed (see Matter of 2-4 Kieffer Lane LLC v County of Ulster, 172 AD3d at 1601; Crossroads ABL LLC v Canaras Capital Mgt., LLC, 105 AD3d at 646). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:20 am
” Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
Terrible Ninth Circuit 230(c)(2) Ruling Will Make the Internet More Dangerous–Enigma v. Malwarebytes
19 Sep 2019, 11:06 am
The demise of the Zango v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:06 am
Today the justices will hear oral argument in Timbs v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:16 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps considers Kavanaugh’s “sole opinion on the issue of choice, a 2017 dissent in Garza v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 3:03 pm
Orlando “Baby Lane” Anderson had been a suspect for decades. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
In Rubin v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Greenberg Senior Fellow for China Studies, Council on Foreign Relations (Testimony)· Joel Wuthnow, Research Fellow, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, National Defense University (Testimony)· Daniel Kliman, Senior Fellow, Asia-Pacific Security Program, Center for a New American Security (Testimony)1:00 PM – 2:00… [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
However, the case that controls whether a state could require side guards would probably be Bibb v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:32 am
In Torres v. [read post]
