Search for: "LONG V USPS"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Courts have long held that the contraction of disease is deemed an injury by accident if due to some unexpected or unusual event or exposure. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
” While the Second Circuit noted in its decision in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:28 pm
Suddarth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Application of the de minimis standard test was consistent with long-established precedent. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:05 am
Application of the de minimis standard test was consistent with long-established precedent. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
” With no statutory definition of undue hardship to guide them, employers have long relied on the Supreme Court case Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
A fairly remarkable example is Johnson v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
The court’s June 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:48 pm
Additional Resources: Goff v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:08 am
Groff refused to work on Sundays, and for a long time, USPS made other arrangements to cover for his absence on Sundays. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court released a unanimous opinion in Groff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
Hardison, she observed, “has been on Congress’s radar screen for a very long time, and they’ve never changed it. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 11:40 am
On Tuesday in Groff v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:34 am
USPS. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 8:34 am
USPS. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Groff v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Groff v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:14 am
As for Groff v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 3:58 am
Groff v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 6:28 pm
Most recently, in EPIC v. [read post]
