Search for: "LONG V. HOLDER"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am
We can only wait for the decision later this month in Harrington v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 7:42 am
The Federal Court has issued a landmark decision (Blacklock’s Reports v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:10 pm
The Graham Factors In a blow to General Motors and other current and aspiring design patent holders and patent lawyers the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just ruled in LKQ CORPORATION v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:32 pm
The issue in the case City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:58 pm
S'holders Litig., 2010 WL 2291842, at *15 (Del. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am
Biskupic's story also confirms what many have long suspected about the Supreme Court's decision in NAMUDNO v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:46 am
In Carl v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
W. v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am
., LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:57 am
See, e.g., U.S. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:07 am
Although the circuit courts have long supported a discovery rule in copyright cases, Hearst argues that this approach is out of step with recent Supreme Court cases in other areas of law, including Gabelli v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
I had long ago forgotten about the post. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
Petrella v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:44 pm
Ariz. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
In Belgium, descriptive seizures (called “saisie-description” in Belgium) are long-standing ex parte procedures to collect evidence of infringement. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Holder, 556 U. [read post]