Search for: "LOPEZ et al v. MORRISON et al"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that federal judges… [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
GONZALES, Attorney General, et al., Petitioners,v.Angel McClaryRAICH et al.No. 03-1454.Argued Nov. 29, 2004.Decided June 6, 2005. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:29 pm
Showing that a criminal act was performed with hair clippers that, at some point in time, crossed state lines does not show that the act in question “affects interstate commerce,” let alone that it has the “substantial effect” required by Lopez, Morrison, et al. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
James III, et al. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
However, the Eleventh Circuit cited Lopez v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Devine, Jon, et al. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:57 am
UPDATE: The petition in Thomas More Law Center, et al., v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:59 pm
That is a very tenuous hook, under some relatively recent* Supreme Court precedents, Lopez and Morrison. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
The petition was Anderson, et al., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Pacific Creditors Association in support of the petition for certiorariBrief of respondent Maria Pintos in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of the Consumer Data Industry Association, et al. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm
Amicus brief of Altera Corporation et al. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
Title: Smith v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:25 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
PriceDocket: 10-10Issue(s): Whether an indigent defendant has a constitutional right to appointed counsel at a civil contempt proceeding that results in his incarceration.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of South Carolina)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:21 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]