Search for: "Lambert v. Thomas"
Results 1 - 20
of 78
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2023, 12:00 am
This weighty tome from Sweet & Maxwell is edited by Richard Davis, Thomas St Quintin and Guy Tritton from Hogarth Chambers, London. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm
Justice Thomas wrote a fiery footnote 2. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am
She wrote about this week and explained how Justice Thomas’s use of the words (“cleaned up”) in parentheses in the brown bag v. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 6:52 am
Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (Judge Melissa Clarke) Thomas v Luv One Luv All Promotions Ltd and another [2020] EWHC 1565 (IPEC) (17 June 2020) This was an application to strike out part of the defence to the claimant's action for passing off and transfer or cancellation of the second defendant's trade mark registration on grounds of cause of action [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 4:13 pm
Skarupa v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 4:13 pm
Skarupa v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
In relation to the ECHR arguments, Lady Black noted that Lambert v France (App No. 46043/14) (2016) 62 EHRR 2, demonstrated that the ECtHR did not regard it as problematic, in principle, that a decision to withhold or withdraw CANH from a patient with PDOC should be made by a doctor, without obligatory court involvement. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[69] Lambert J.A., in the B.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
Lambert, which involves the timeliness of an appeal from a denial of class-action certification. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd t/a Mylan & Anor, heard 12-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
Author JaggeryLicence: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2-0Source Wikipedia Jane Lambert Pablo Star Media Ltd v Bowen [2017] EWHC 2541 (IPEC) (13 Oct 2017) The above photograph is of a pub in Tenby where Dylan Thomas left the manuscript of Under Milk Wood on a stool. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
., Bradley Joondeph, Thomas Lambert, Richard Lazarus, J. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:59 pm
In its decision the District Court took account of – and came to the same conclusion as – the UK High Court’s Warner-Lambert v Activis decisions (Lyrica – January 2015). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 12:08 pm
Authored by Thomas Burke and Rochelle Wilcox of Davis Wright Tremaine. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:19 pm
New Oxford vice chancellor speaks out against threats to free inquiry as well as overregulation of universities [Iain Martin, CapX] Feds: get in line on Title IX or we’ll yank your institutional science funding [Inside Higher Ed, background on Title IX] More on scheme proposing mandatory oppression studies for first-year students at American University [Robby Soave/The Daily Beast (and thanks for mention), earlier] Back to the days of Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
, Amy Lambert and Louise Benski, Privacy and Information Law Blog. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
According to the Complaint, Stuart and Lambert `were charged and convicted of Offenses against Computer Uses, Prohibition of Lewd Acts and Theft. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
Thomas Farkas offers this highly positive interpretation of the words of the CJEU, arguing that the Nestlé application should now be allowed to succeed. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Almost all of these updates have been compiled and crafted by our good friend and dedicated colleague Alberto Bellan, to whom the IPKat and Merpel raise their paws in a respectful and grateful salute.Don't forget: there's also a mini-summary at the bottom of the post that lists the features carried by this weblog over the previous month.Last week's substantive Katposts look like this:* Swiss claims: a Kat reflects on the Warner-Lambert v Actavis appealAfter… [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:31 am
| EPO Administrative Council and Board of Appeal’s removal.Never too late 36 [week ending Sunday 8 March] - EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) says Chairman can disobey | OHIM is too rich to be true | eLAW’s TM infringement checklist | Human right and IP | Again on Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Seiko and Seiki in Singapore | The politics of US patent law reform | Haribo v Lindt Goldbear wars | Patent trolls | Private copying |… [read post]
