Search for: "Land v. Marshall"
Results 1 - 20
of 556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Thurgood Marshall. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:04 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
" Episode 2:6 is on the Native Land Court. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 3:30 am
Green Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
’” United States v. 564.54 Acres of Land, 441 U.S. 506, 510–11 (1979) (quoting Olson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
Adriatic Land 5 Ltd v Long Leaseholders at Hippersley Point (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES – BUILDING SAFETY ACT 2022) (2023) UKUT 271 (LC) On an application by the landlord for dispensation from section 20 consultation requirements, the Upper Tribunal held that the FTT had erred in imposing as a condition of dispensation that the landlord be precluded from putting the costs of the application through the service charge. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Nixon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:15 pm
Sovereignty, jurisdiction, and lands matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
He continued to win several more cases before finally landing on the one that would forever impact history: Brown v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
In December, the Court granted review in Fischer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:23 am
In Lyng v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:58 pm
"The post Final Post on Moore v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
" Marshal listed them as "Lands, slaves, stock [i.e., business capital] of all kinds, and a few other articles of domestic property. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
But in Castro-Huerta, the Court took precisely the kind of arguments about state power that Chief Justice Marshall rejected in Worcester and turned them into the law of the land—without any recognition of the arguments’ Indian Removal–era origins.This Article corrects the Court’s oversight. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:21 pm
Professor Amar's view is that "we must remember that it is a Constitution that we are expounding" that would last "for the ages" as John Marshall said in McCulloch v. [read post]
