Search for: "Landmark Safety LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 5:22 pm
Bruen, the landmark ruling shifted the Second Amendment landscape. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
(consolidated on March 12, 2024),[15] one of several complaints filed in the USA against AI companies in 2023,[16] have investigated the issue at hand.[17] With the launch of GPT-4 on March 14, 2023, OpenAI has become increasingly secretive, citing “the competitive landscape and the safety implications of large-scale models like GPT-4”[18] to explain its choice. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
This future landmark event may result not only in unprecedented penalties but could also drive a transformative shift in how food safety is integrated into the core values and operations of companies. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 7:22 am
” Constantine Cannon partner Gordon Schnell stated: “we are very excited by this landmark settlement and look forward to our continued work on these matters in the other states. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 2:01 pm
In a landmark unanimous ruling late last week, Murray v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 10:17 am
In a landmark unanimous ruling late last week, Murray v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In lieu of our regular Friday feature—”the Week in Review”—The Regulatory Review is today recapping some of the top regulatory news from the past year, including major U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 6:45 am
On October 7, 2023 California Governor Gavin Newsom signed two landmark climate disclosure laws aimed at making major companies publicly disclose their greenhouse gas emissions and report on their climate-related financial risks. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am
The CDA was struck down in 1997 in a landmark case, Reno v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
Supreme Court broke for recess at the end of June, it issued several landmark decisions, some of which have caught the attention of California businesses and employers for their potential — and in some cases unknown — impact. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 9:15 am
The post Toxic Tort Claims: How to Prove Liability and Recover Damages appeared first on Wool Trial Law LLC. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
However, Google and DeepMind argue that the case should be dismissed following the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50, in which it was held that uniform damages could not be obtained for each member of the class [148]. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
Additionally, GSA was concerned about public safety and graffiti. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The lawmakers say the companies deceived European lawmakers during negotiations on two landmark laws by hiding behind fronts. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:00 pm
Department of the Interior (Federal Recognition) Evans Energy Partners, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 11:30 am
In Nostrum Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
National/Federal ‘Blue’ Suburban Moms Are Mobilizing to Counter Conservatives in Fights Over Masks, Book Bans and Diversity Education Washington Post – Annie Gowan | Published: 2/9/2022 Dozens of suburban moms from around the country dialed into an Ohio-based Zoom training session with the same goal – to learn how to combat the increasingly vitriolic rhetoric from parents whose protests over mask mandates and diversity education have turned school board meeting rooms… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petitioners argued that the record contained substantial evidence of a fair argument that the project would have a significant safety impact and that an EIR was required. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Petitioners argued that the record contained substantial evidence of a fair argument that the project would have a significant safety impact and that an EIR was required. [read post]
