Search for: "Lanham v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,020
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 9:36 am
” But she also reasoned that, in the panel’s words, “infringing goods do not offend the Lanham Act merely by their presence in the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:57 am
I Dig Texas, LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 11:20 am
Hasemann v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The Court of Appeal did not mention the fact that the largest baking company in the United States includes the word in its name - Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:50 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
Meanwhile, lower courts struggled with how to fit the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
When the Lanham Act passed, he was convinced it incorporated that already in section 44. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
In 2012, the case of Louboutin v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court decided on Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
Campfield v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
Elster, No. 22-704, the United States Supreme Court has heard argument and is expected to decide in the next several months whether Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act can prevent the federal registration of TRUMP TOO SMALL as a trademark for shirts and hats. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:15 am
Elster, No. 22-704, the United States Supreme Court has heard argument and is expected to decide in the next several months whether Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act can prevent the federal registration of TRUMP TOO SMALL as a trademark for shirts and hats. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
They do not extend to infringement occurring solely outside of the United States, even if consumer confusion occurs in the United States. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:32 pm
Recall notice: Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused registration of “Trump Too Small” under Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act (15 USC 1052(c)) because the phrase includes a living individual’s name without his written consent. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:08 am
In March, the Illinois law firm, MillerKing brought the putative class action against DoNotPay on behalf of “all law firms in the United States,” alleging false association and false advertising under the federal Lanham Act and Illinois state law. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Under the Court's precedents (including, notoriously, Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
Bruen, in which the court struck down New York’s handgun-licensing scheme, the justices will hear argument in another major gun-rights case: United States v. [read post]
