Search for: "Lanham v. United States of America"
Results 1 - 20
of 155
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
The Court of Appeal did not mention the fact that the largest baking company in the United States includes the word in its name - Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
La Barbera v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing… [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
For example, in Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 10:48 am
I Dig Texas, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am
March 2, 2023 | By: David Ludwig Last month, the Fourth Circuit issued a landmark intellectual property ruling in The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:27 am
The Supreme Court has also held, in a 1940 unanimous opinion in Bacardi Corp. of America v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 12:17 pm
Sinatro v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:26 am
Nor has Opposer pleaded any facts to support how its use of the TORTRIX mark in Central and South America has resulted in the mark having a reputation among consumers in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
E.g., United We Stand America, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm
Alcon Vision, LLC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:07 am
In United Federation of Churches v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
’” The examining attorney at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) refused to register the proposed mark on the ground the phrase falsely suggests a connection with a person (here Donald Trump) in violation of Lanham Act Section 2(a), and also because this mark violates Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
Thornton v. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 6:57 am
President the executive authority, with confirmation by the Senate, to appoint all “Officers of the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
Structural Plywood Integrity Coalition v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 7:42 am
Case date: 17 March 2021 Case number: No. 19-2316 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
