Search for: "Leathers v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
BackgroundIn 2008, Yannick Noah, a French former tennis player, registered the following figurative sign (the Mark) as a European Union trade mark (EUTM), in respect of a number of categories of goods, including leather goods, clothing, games and playthings (the Registration): In 2019, Noah Clothing LLC, a clothing company based in the United States, filed an application with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) seeking revocation of the… [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:28 pm
Background On Sunday, December 1, 2019, a mail carrier was working for the United States Postal Service (“USPS”). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
One might think dancing isn't a type of content, but rather a particular medium—and cases like Leathers v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:44 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:40 am
Fund v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
In the United States, trademark rights are acquired through exclusive, continuous use, not registration. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm
Joshi replies that the court’s precedent has suggested as much in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:31 am
Cherepanov v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am
United States: two second-degree murder convictions overturned after three days of police questioning in the absence of counsel. 1944 Ashcroft v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:54 pm
In Leather, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:11 pm
From Hermes Int'l v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:56 am
The Court therefore, entered judgment in favor of the United States and dismissed the case.By Lawrence M. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
In other words, if antitrust is indeed the “magna carta” of American free enterprise (see United States v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:40 am
United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am
” Similarly, in Germany in Nokia v Daimler, the Mannheim court stated that the “royalty provided in [Daimler’s] counter-offer is not reasonable, as the reference value used in the top-down approach in the form of the average purchase price of [TCUs] is unsuitable. [read post]
