Search for: "Leder v Spiegel"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
Corp. v McManus & Richter, _ AD3d _, 2024 NY Slip Op 00799, * 5 [1 st Dept 2024]). [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 5:04 am
” To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, in addition to an attorney-clientrelationship, the complaint must set forth “the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages” (Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
” (Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007] [internal citations omitted].) [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:34 am
(Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d at 268.) [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 5:23 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257 [2008]). [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
It is not a big surprise that Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am
“To state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must allege: (1) that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession; and (2) that the attorney’s breach of the duty proximately caused the plaintiff actual and ascertainable damages” (Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 176 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Leder v… [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257 [2008] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:04 am
Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 4:31 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must plead “the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages” (Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267 [1st Dept 2006], a.ffd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied, 552 US 1257 [2008] [citations omitted]). [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
See Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 268 (I st Dept 2006) (“The failure to demonstrate proximate cause mandates the dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardless of whether the attorney was negligent. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:22 am
Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 (2007) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted), cert denied sub nom. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:50 am
See Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 268 (I st Dept 2006) (“The failure to demonstrate proximate cause mandates the dismissal of a legal malpractice action regardles~ of whether the attorney was negligent. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:40 am
Spiegel v Rowland, 552 US 1257; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302; Gioeli v Vlachos, 89 AD3d 984; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d 169, 176). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:26 am
"Nonetheless, the complaint must be dismissed because plaintiff failed to show that any negligence on defendants' part proximately caused it to be unable to exploit the commercial permit (see Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267-268 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:52 am
These allegations do not set out the standard of skill required of an attorney or state that defendant's actions fell below that skill level (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; compare Canavan v Steenburg, 170 AD2d 858, 859 [1991]; see also Kolev and Collins, The Importance of Due Diligence: Real Estate Transactions in a Complex Land Use World, 84 NY St BJ 24 [March/April 2012]). [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:28 am
Spiegel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:25 am
In Leder v Spiegel(31 AD3d 246,267 [ 1” Dept 2006 the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that “[in order to state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the complaint must set forth three elements: the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:49 am
Finally, construing the pleading in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as is required on consideration of [*4]a CPLR 3211 motion to dismiss, we find that it asserts actions and omissions by defendants that support viable claims for recovery (see Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]). [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am
These allegations met the requirements of a legal malpractice claim inasmuch as they set forth " the negligence of the attorney; that the negligence was the proximate cause of the loss sustained; and actual damages'" (see O'Callaghan v Brunelle, 84 AD3d 581, 582 [2011], quoting Leder v Spiegel, 31 AD3d 266, 267 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 836 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]). [read post]
