Search for: "Lederer v. Lederer"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
In Chrabalowski v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 10:26 am
In [*2]any event, Lederer fails to show that it suffered any actual damages as a result of defendants' conduct (see Postel v Jaffe & Segal, 237 AD2d 127 [1997]" [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 6:38 am
Added to this was the aftermath from the Supreme Court's decision in Alice Corp v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 3:56 pm
Michelle Leder, of Footnoted, was on NPR's Marketplace yesterday. [read post]
18 May 2009, 3:56 pm
Zurich Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
[Beattie] and Leder were in the doorway swearing at Spears while the beating occurred. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:50 am
Donna [the plaintiff] will be provided with the ability to inspect Leder’s books and records at the offices of Leder’s accountants, Scott & Guilfoyle. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:30 am
It is not a big surprise that Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:26 am
Plaintiff also failed to submit non-speculative evidence in support of its damages claims (see Leder, 31 AD3d at 268; Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 294 [2001]). [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:59 am
Accordingly, contrary to the defendants' contention, the complaint adequately pleaded the element regarding the defendants' failure to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d at 837). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:19 am
Plaintiff put forth sufficient detail to establish the negligence of the attorneys, that the negligence was the proximate cause of the losses sustained by the benefits funds, and actual damages to those funds (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; O'Callaghan v Brunelle, 84 AD3d 581, 582 [2011]). [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:04 am
Ortiz v Joel J. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 5:55 am
On a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), a cause of action for legal malpractice is properly dismissed where the conduct alleged in the complaint, “even if accepted as true[,] does not establish negligence” (Leder, 9 NY3d at 837; see generally Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d 843, 847 [2d Dept 2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 857 [2013]). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 2:32 pm
" United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Defense lawyers, who I believe were the Leder Law Group in D.C., filed a motion to compel. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Defense lawyers, who I believe were the Leder Law Group in D.C., filed a motion to compel. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:10 am
Accordingly, contrary to the defendants' contention, the complaint adequately pleaded the element regarding the defendants' failure to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d at 837). [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:22 am
Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 (2007) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted), cert denied sub nom. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:52 am
These allegations do not set out the standard of skill required of an attorney or state that defendant's actions fell below that skill level (see Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836, 837 [2007], cert denied 552 US 1257 [2008]; compare Canavan v Steenburg, 170 AD2d 858, 859 [1991]; see also Kolev and Collins, The Importance of Due Diligence: Real Estate Transactions in a Complex Land Use World, 84 NY St BJ 24 [March/April 2012]). [read post]
