Search for: "Leitch v. Leitch"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 4:00 am
[v] Shawn Burton, “The Case for Plain-Language Contracts” (April23, 2024), online: <hbr.org> [https://hbr.org/2018/01/the-case-for-plain-language-contracts]. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm
“In Leitch v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
The Lord Justices of the House of Lords stated in the case of Ranger v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 1:17 pm
Wade" by Will Leitch (Intelligencer). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Legal FeedsSupreme Court clarifies dynamic between rules of evidence and a judge’s trial-management power The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
By Jennifer Leitch, JD, LLM, PhDSenior Research Fellow, Canadian Forum on Civil Justice The post An Ethical Update: Time for the Law Society of Ontario to Act appeared first on Slaw. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:00 am
In Grand River Conservation Authority v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
The 2017 decision Pintea v Johns has been heralded as a watershed moment for self-represented litigants in Canada. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:08 am
Leitch v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The lawyer’s right to make a living cannot trump the rights of ordinary people to access justice Here is the Canadian Lawyer survey, (referred to by Jennifer Leitch) showing rising legal fees and profitability of family law: https://t.co/V9nvz6Ipzo? [read post]
23 May 2018, 4:00 am
— Jennifer Leitch, PhDSenior Research Fellow, Canadian Forum on Civil Justice ___________________________ [1] Fontaine v Canada (Attorney General), 2014 ONSC 283 at 64 [2] Fontaine v Canada (Attorney General), 2012 BCSC 839 at 29-30 [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:22 pm
Madam Justice Leitch concluded at para. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 3:30 am
In Paterson-Leitch Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:46 am
She ruled that the defendant landowner was responsible to return the neighbouring landowner to the position it was in prior to the wrong committed.The plaintiff landowner advanced its claims on the basis of the doctrine in Rylands v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
(On this, I agree with Leitch that we have the order right, that gambling is a far greater sin than taking drugs designed to help you play better and for longer). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
Pagliaro, Chapter 16 “Class Actions,” in Haig, Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts, §§ 16:1 et seq. (2d ed.). [2] Montgomery Ward & Co. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
Pagliaro, Chapter 16 “Class Actions,” in Haig, Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts, §§ 16:1 et seq. (2d ed.). [2] Montgomery Ward & Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
Except that Dopson-Troutt actually cited Hahn v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:54 am
Leitch J. recognized the same concern in Dobbie v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:54 am
Leitch J. recognized the same concern in Dobbie v. [read post]
