Search for: "Lepis v. Lepis"
Results 1 - 20
of 218
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2024, 1:32 pm
Lepis v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:13 am
” J.R. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:26 am
The recent Appellate Division decision of Litton v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:28 am
We previously blogged in 2014 about Marsico v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 10:38 am
We have blogged many times before about what it takes to obtain a modification of child support and/or alimony, but as a quick refresher, the seminal case on this issue is Lepis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
This is exactly the scenario that took place in the case of Oshidar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
This is exactly the scenario that took place in the case of Oshidar v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:51 am
Faherty, 97 N.J. 99, 222 (1984): “child support [is] always subject to modification for changed circumstances…” Pursuant to Lepis v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 7:12 am
Solotoff, Esq. blogging on the case Landau v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:20 am
The Appellate Division recently published a decision, Amzler v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 8:22 am
Div. 2016) (quoting Lepis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:44 pm
As part of their settlement agreement they agree that Husband will pay Wife alimony subject to an anti-Lepis provision (based on Lepis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 12:44 pm
As part of their settlement agreement they agree that Husband will pay Wife alimony subject to an anti-Lepis provision (based on Lepis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm
Generally, to modify either custody or support, the seminal case of Lepis v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 12:15 pm
Generally, to modify either custody or support, the seminal case of Lepis v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 5:13 am
Lepis. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 5:13 am
Lepis. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 11:26 am
The seminal case in New Jersey on modification of support obligations is Lepis v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:35 am
You further file a legal brief describing the case law, including Lepis v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:34 am
” The Appellate Division’s reasoning depended on the seminal case in New Jersey on modification of support obligations: Lepis v. [read post]
