Search for: "Levi v Levi"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: May 30, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: May 30, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:13 am
The Supreme Court’s Starbucks Decision In Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: May 30, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: May 30, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 7:30 am
Davis, and Helvering v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:28 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 365 So. 3d 353, 354 (Fla. 2023) (alteration in original) (quoting Levy v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:07 am
Joseph Arena emphasizes this important lesson and why associations need to be familiar with their governing documents in, “THIS CASE: Desch v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:18 am
The case is Prosec Guards CC v Department of Public Works and Infrastructure and Others (2501/23; 2502/23) [2024] ZAWCHC 139 (24 May 2024). [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
MASSEY, KANNER & PINTALUGA, P.A., LEVI LAWRENCE WILKES, and SUSAN AYERS, Appellees. 6th District. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am
(Editor’s Note: This article is part of our new symposium on the ICC and the Israel-Hamas war.) [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
" Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmovant (see Vega v Restani Constr. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
" Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmovant (see Vega v Restani Constr. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:02 am
Copan Italia S.p.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Davis v Schley2024 NY Slip Op 02614Decided on May 10, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 10, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill-Levy, JJ.Index No. 153380/24 Appeal No. 2415 Case No. 2024-02974[*1]In the Matter of… [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Davis v Schley2024 NY Slip Op 02614Decided on May 10, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 10, 2024Before: Moulton, J.P., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill-Levy, JJ.Index No. 153380/24 Appeal No. 2415 Case No. 2024-02974[*1]In the Matter of… [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:29 am
The owners of the sectional titles would pay levies to the body corporate who would then pay the municipality. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, his reasons for walking on the floor despite the warnings are irrelevant since a slip and fall would not be unexpected in the circumstances.A remand to the Trustees is not warranted since they considered the statements of the three witnesses, which were consistent, and petitioner did not deny that their account of the incident was accurate (see Matter of McCartan v Shea, 211 AD3d 534, 535 [1st Dept 2022]).THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE… [read post]