Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED April 19, 2011."
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
” [17] Russian Law against “Gay Propaganda” among minors At the end of 2011, the State Duma (the lower house of the Federal Assembly of Russia) started discussing the need to create a new federal law regarding “Gay Propaganda” among minors as it could cause harm to their health and development. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
The Supreme Court found that the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest defendant and reversed the suppression order, remanding for further proceedings. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Companion animals are not listed, nor provided in, the text of the Automatic Orders. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Hall stated that respondent should have disclosed the SIG Sauer handgun on his 2020 employee personal information form, filed with petitioner on April 22, 2020, and he should have disclosed the Smith and Wesson rifle on the 2019 and 2020 forms (Tr. 69, 71-72). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Hall stated that respondent should have disclosed the SIG Sauer handgun on his 2020 employee personal information form, filed with petitioner on April 22, 2020, and he should have disclosed the Smith and Wesson rifle on the 2019 and 2020 forms (Tr. 69, 71-72). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:16 pm
We have created a new facebook group to address the impact of the new executive order and other changing developments related to COVID-19. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
In October 2019, the mother filed a petition seeking custody of the child. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
The child was 13 years old, and had no adjudicated father and no father listed on his birth certificate. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am
Then on this week’s order list, the court denied cert on one of the remaining two, 10-time relist Johnson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
The NRA said it continues to review the alleged abuse of funds, as the tax-exempt organization curtails services and runs up multimillion-dollar legal bills. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
The only claim to be heard at the Final Hearing is TPD from March 9, 2019 to April 21, 2020. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
April 19, 2018) (ordering disgorgement of fees and barring UpRight from filing cases in the Northern District of Alabama for eighteen months). 3 Despite this representation, neither of the attorneys are listed on the Amourgis website, while both attorneys still appear on the Deighan Law/Upright Law website. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Joseph Pellicer, MD was on duty in the emergency hospital and listed Mikayla’s chief complaints as “abdominal pain, emesis, diarrhea, and fever. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
The latest iteration of the Restatement of the Law of Consumer Contracts (draft) aspires to summarize majority common-law rules and trends based on “all” relevant cases in a particular area of (consumer) law.Link to -- > Tentative Draft dated April 18, 2019 But what is a relevant case? [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
But many default judgments in collection cases brought on consumer debt in Texas are never challenged, and many old judgments containing hefty attorney’s fees re-surface years later when the creditor (or its assignee) files an application for a writ of garnishment to freeze and seize a judgment-debtor’s bank account.ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ERIC LANGFORD, DAN BASSO, AND TOBIN GROVE, Petitioners,v.UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Respondent.No. 16-0006.Supreme Court of Texas.Argued October 31,… [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas. [read post]
