Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 15, 2013."
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2014, 8:17 pm
But the anonymous requester(s) kept fighting for a more comprehensive review and filed a petition. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Salla, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2013 WL 1681220 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept.) [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
The Court of Appeal denied the County’s writ petition. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
Eighteen states, while arguing that the district courts had jurisdiction to hear their claims, filed protective petitions for review in their respective circuit courts. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
Dawson, 2013-Ohio-4074 (2nd Dist.) [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The fee for petitions for review is to be reimbursed when the proceedings are re-opened before the BoA, even if further requests filed with the petition for review (here: replacement of members of the BoA) are unsuccessful, i.e. even if the requests of the petitioner are only partly successful. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:38 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE January 25, 2013 Mr. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm
(Policy) Response: USCIS continues to review the issues related to the interpretation of “specialized knowledge,” and is considering AILA’s memorandum of January 24, 2012 as part of this review.[3] The February 2012 NFAP Policy Brief cited by AILA provided an analysis of data that revealed high denial rates for L-1 and H-1B petitions at the USCIS. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 6:10 am
In the letter, dated January 5, 2012, [Zahorik] informed Donoho that he filed an `Identity Theft/Fraud complaint’ with his local police department due to the recommendation of the FTC. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am
Hunter said his resignation would be effective January 13. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
In October 2019, the mother filed a petition seeking custody of the child. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
In January 2011, the deputy sheriffs proposed a two day rodeo. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has recently denied Jenzabar’s petition for further appellate review of this case -- another welcome victory for Long Bow, but we will likely need to pursue the deeper issues in another forum. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has recently denied Jenzabar’s petition for further appellate review of this case -- another welcome victory for Long Bow, but we will likely need to pursue the deeper issues in another forum. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Cause No. 16-0854) and is one of two petitions for review scheduled to be heard at the University of Houston's law school on Friday, September 15, 2017. [read post]
