Search for: "Little v. Spaeth"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2020, 11:35 am
In a prominent 1996 article, Professors Jeffrey Segal and Harold Spaeth wrote (paywall link) about how justices who dissent in important cases continue to dissent in future cases on the same issues, even as precedent clearly builds in the opposite direction (as in the case of a justice who dissented from Roe v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
In the 2009 case Montejo v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
Spaeth.) [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:05 pm
Spaeth, and Thomas G. [read post]