Search for: "Little v. Tall"
Results 1 - 20
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 3:00 am
He just, like, moved back a little bit and then they attacked,” the second witness said. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2024 The thirteen consistory court judgments circulated in April included: Reordering, extensions and other building works Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs Fonts Also included are: CDM Decisions and Safeguarding; Reports from the Independent Reviewer; Privy Council Business; Other legal issues; CFCE Determinations; and Links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am
So Russia wants Ukraine back in the USSR, while Ukrainians insist that they can get by with a little help from our friends. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm
Little wonder the Koch network has found this effort so deserving of its largesse. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
It may well be the case that the ruling bears directly on an issue of political significance with little or no obvious direct relevance for businesses or commercial conduct. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am
The prosecution case was that the promotion and sale of the oil mixture was little more than exploitative commercial opportunism disguised as an article of faith [8]. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:40 am
v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 1:16 pm
The opinions in Texas Tech Health Sciences Ctr. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 11:41 am
Blakely v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Because President Joe Biden leads the dominant, centrist bloc of his party, and because the President is also deeply committed to caution (almost at the level of his DNA, it sometimes seems), the idea of convincing him to get behind doing something even a little bit weird is a tall order, to say the least.The most obvious manifestation of Biden’s muscle-memory-like rejection of anything that seems politically risky is his repeated reluctance to endorse the view that the… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:11 am
“People v Donald ….mmm, hang on, how is that pronounced? [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoffophiles continue to tell tall tales about Selikoff’s work and in particular about how he became involved in asbestos medicine.[5] So here is a timeline of Selikoff’s life and asbestos work, an update of an earlier version. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
For example, no less important a case than Marbury v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 11:14 am
He said that if asked, he would vote to codify the decision from Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
There is little new here.With one exception. . . . [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 1:23 pm
A divided court issued its decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
