Search for: "Lloyd v. Oliver"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
From State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 1:18 pm
Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
UK journalist Oliver Bullough is being sued for defamation in Portugal by the vice-president of Angola. [read post]
30 May 2021, 4:07 pm
Peers in the Lords Communications and Digital Committee have written to Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden with fears that the draft Online Safety Bill does not go far enough to protect the industry of journalism. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am
In Buck v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am
Moreover, in the UK, (in direct contradistinction from the Innsbruck decision) the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) (which I discuss briefly here) held that plaintiffs can recover damages for loss of control of their data without proving pecuniary loss or distress. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
On the same day Julian Knowles J handed down judgment in the case of Oliver v Shaikh [2019] EWHC 3389 (QB). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am
It appears that this is the first such action after the decision in Lloyd v Google earlier this month (see our post on the case). [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court Ms Stocker sought permission to appeal to the Supreme Court – and on 9 July 2018 Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs granted the permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal to dismiss her appeal from the judgment of Mitting J. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 6:15 am
Olive Missionary Baptist Church v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
The case of Padwick Properties ltd v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:56 pm
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 74 [week ending on Sunday 29 November] – Bob Marley copyright | Nintendo TPM triumphs in Italy | GIs and TMs in the EU | Prebalin again | YouTube will defend fair use | End-of-year reading |Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd | Goodbye from Jeremy, and thank you from us | Greekat on plain packaging | Rovi Guides Inc v Virgin Media Ltd &… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
****************** PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never Too Late 72 [week ending on Sunday 15 November] – Merck Sharp & Dohme v Ono Pharmaceutical | Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd | Economics of internet trolls | UK IPO scammer scammed | Video conferencing at the EPO | Warner-Lambert v Pfizer in France | African Ministerial Conference in IP | Green… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
* When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continuedWarner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat) is the latest in a series of decisions in the ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of Lyrica. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm
For the reasons outlined above in my analysis of Grant v Todorovic (supra) I do not feel that this is such a case. [read post]
