Search for: "Lofgren v. Lofgren"
Results 1 - 20
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), expressly permitted objections based on section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
In Katz v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
In a previous post, I described the political landscape for this year’s Section 702 reauthorization debate and noted the view of most observers that Section 702 is unlikely to be reauthorized this year without significant reforms. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm
Legal expert Benjamin Ginsberg, who represented Republicans in election disputes including Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
On September 23, 2020, Representatives Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), the Vice Chair of the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship, along with Chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Chair of the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship, sent a letter to then-DHS Acting Secretary Chad Wolf urging him to address the complaints, according to the press release. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:46 am
v=2Sj0_J1KnbM Get bonus content on Patreon See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm
In particular, the Order encourages the Chair of the FTC to exercise the FTC’s statutory rulemaking authority in areas such as (i) unfair data collection and surveillance practices that may damage competition, consumer autonomy, and consumer privacy, (ii) unfair anticompetitive restrictions on third-party repair or self-repair of items, such as the restrictions imposed by powerful manufacturers that prevent farmers from repairing their own equipment; (iii) unfair anticompetitive conduct or… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
& Health Servs. v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 6:43 am
v=MqFgUFwxHiY [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 5:38 am
Michèle Flournoy joined AcquisitionTalk's Eric Lofgren and me for another crossover episode of China-AcquisitionTalk. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:49 pm
And, as the Supreme Court in Riley v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 5:22 pm
But the landmark 2018 Supreme Court decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Tipsy on the bench. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
J. 131 (2013) in King v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:26 pm
However, on September 27, 2019, two and a half years after it was originally scheduled, oral argument in Save Jobs USA v. [read post]
