Search for: "Long v. Brown" Results 1 - 20 of 3,608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm by Amy Howe
Joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Elena Kagan dissented from the court’s decision. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
Virginia—to sex blindness, where progressives have long wanted us to go. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:48 pm by AccelerateEditor
We are pleased with the outcome and having Charlie on our team certainly made the long process of recovery a bit easier. [read post]
7 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Ilya Somin (George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School) has posted Brown, Democracy, and Foot Voting (American Journal of Law and Equality, Symposium on the 70th Anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC recently sued to block Tapestry’s proposed acquisition of Capri, alleging that the effect of the combination of the companies’ handbag brands may be to substantially lessen competition. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Indeed, it is impossible to understand last Term’s decision in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:50 am by Dan Farber
As this timeline shows, the Supreme Court’s engagement with this issue has been long and complex. 1944. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
”[58] Other long-term problems include the risk for hypertension, proteinuria (abnormal amounts of protein in the urine that can portend a decline in renal function), and reduced kidney filtration rate.[59] Since the longest available follow-up studies of HUS victims are 25 years, an accurate lifetime prognosis is not readily available and remains controversial.[60] All that can be said for certain is that HUS causes permanent injury, including loss of kidney function,… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
The primary issue for the Court was whether it was in the best interests of the child to remain in Nanaimo until long-term parenting arrangements were decided. [read post]