Search for: "Long v. CVS Caremark Corporation"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In particular, the Second Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
The SEC’s Division of Corporate Finance first issued Guidance Topic No. 9 on March 25, 2020. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
CVS Caremark Corp. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
It ends with a consideration of key trends and developments going forward.COURSE CONCEPT STATEMENT:Two questions dominated a century-long debate about the economic, social, and political role of economic actors operating in corporate form: Whom must corporations serve and to what extent should the regulation of corporations be left to the market, to private ordering (contract law) among corporate stakeholders, or to public regulation by the state? [read post]
27 May 2013, 11:36 pm
CVS Caremark was formed through a March 2007 merger between CVS Corp. and Caremark Rx Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
LONG v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am
Among the companies that have successfully used the (i)(9) argument recently to exclude special meeting proposals are: CVS Caremark, Medco, Honeywell, NiSource, Baker Hughes, Becton Dickinson & Co., Eastman Chemical, and Safeway. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:09 am
Cox, alluding to the AFSCME v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
Caremark Rx LLC merged with CVS Corporation in March of this year, making it one of the largest pharmaceutical services companies and provider of comprehensive drug benefit services to health plan sponsors throughout the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
Melvin Watt of North Carolina asked Cox about the proposed NYSE rule and voiced concern that broker votes enabled a CVS/Caremark director to win election in May. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 9:57 pm
CVS, by terms of the CVS/Caremark merger agreement, controls the value of the dividend. [read post]