Search for: "Long v. Quality Computers and Applications, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Shipman and Ligon offer practical pointers and takeaways that are applicable in virtually all jurisdictional contexts. [read post]
5 May 2023, 4:00 am by Robert McKay
As to what is learnt from this example, obviously, it should be remembered that the rules applicable to, and the experiences of a long-standing family business in Europe, in a country whose total population is less than that of many individual large cities around the world, are not necessarily transferable. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm by Francis Pileggi
(The Chancery opinion weighed in at 194-pages long, and the Supreme Court’s opinion, including the concurrence, in total was just under 100-pages long.) [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
A year-long subscription is $35.99.[9] How does AI create the avatars? [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Full Scope Enablement in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
If Congress passes strong federal privacy legislation—as I hope it does—or if there is any other significant change in applicable law, then the Commission would be able to reassess the value-add of this effort and whether continuing it is a sound use of resources. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
"[162] There are no "spectators" to "the whole" of Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube, except perhaps a few computer-assisted researchers. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
  To facilitate its use, Sun also developed the Java SE (Standard Edition) Application Programming Interface (API). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Once the plaintiff shows that the Disruptive stock was not registered with the SEC and applicable states, Disruptive and Speed have the burden of proving the offering complied with applicable securities registration exemptions of applicable federal and state securities laws. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 2:21 am
Developed by the Second Circuit in its opinion in Computer Associates Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]