Search for: "Long v. State, Dept. of Human Resources"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Dept. of Health & Human Services 23 serve as tactical guideposts. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Michigan Dept of State Police to exclude a state from the meaning of the word "person. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
That tribunal had been the subject of widespread and high-level criticism in relation to its fairness and independence, including from the US Dept of State and the Bar Human Rights Committee. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 347 N.C. 247 (1997), where a majority of the court held that the state could choose to pay for the childbirth expenses of indigent women but not for medically necessary abortions for the same population. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 7:34 am
The Court also left intact its landmark decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:22 am
For instance, in Robles v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
” Congress passed the Act in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
For the latter reason, the applicants argue that the Order is not neutral and generally applicable for purposes of Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am
Houses of worship have been feeding the spirit long before the ink on our Constitution dried. [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
See Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
But it might also be said that 2019 was as much the year of the anti-climax--that is, the year that events, long anticipated, finally burst fully ripened. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:55 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:08 pm
Dept. of Industrial Relations. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:37 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
This is an issue ripe for a Supreme Court ruling, for it contradicts theSecond and Ninth Circuit’s long-standing belief that a plaintiff should be able to sue for every ADA violation related to his or her disability after encountering any one violation. [read post]
