Search for: "Lopez v. Unknown" Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Lopez added current rules under the UK GDPR are “too vague, too complex and too confusing always to understand. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Mishcon de Reya blog has written an open letter to the Minister of State at the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport, Julia Lopez, to highlight the risk to “information rights” laws under the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, introduced to Parliament on 22 September 2022. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am by INFORRM
On 12 and 13 July 2022 Jay J heard the case of Hodson v Persons Unknown & Others. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The true value of the risk is unknown, and may be as low as zero. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:01 am by Russell Knight
Betance-Lopez, 38 NE 3d 36 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2015 Illinois divorce law is hard. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
  The judge discharged injunctions that he had granted against Persons Unknown based on the principles derived from the decision of the Court of Appeal in Canada Goose [2020] EWCA Civ 303. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
Hospitals are betting on the acquisition of physician practices like primary care to help maintain census as they hedge against the unknowns of population health management [12]. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am by Nate Nead
Hospitals are betting on the acquisition of physician practices like primary care to help maintain census as they hedge against the unknowns of population health management [12]. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 1:55 pm by Steve Kalar
The Court then granted Martinez-Lopez’s motion to file supplemental briefing in light of Mathis v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 6:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Alito filed a separate opinion concurring in the judgment and Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part (EEOC v. [read post]