Search for: "Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications"
Results 1 - 20
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
New on the Bound By Oath podcast: the story of Berman v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
Cnty. of Los Angeles (C.D. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
[The letter indicates what the Orishas communicate to the orisha communities and uninitiated believers (the laity), how they will fare in the course of the current year, and what they must do so that possible coming tragedies do not catch them so unprepared. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
This so-called "Glomar response" is derived from a Cold War-era case, when the CIA refused to confirm or deny to the Los Angeles Times whether it had information about the USNS Hughes Glomar Explorer, a CIA ship that was used to try to salvage a sunken Soviet spy sub. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
City of Los Angeles (2022) 81 Cal.App.5th 657 In 2010, the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (“LADWP”), and Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Board of Commissioners (collectively, “Los Angeles”) approved a set of substantively identical leases (2010 Leases) governing about 6,100 acres of land Los Angeles owns in Mono County. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In City of Richmond v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
The Supreme Court's ruling in City of Austin v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 11:40 pm
He earned a Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in economics from University of California, Los Angeles in 1984. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
”[14] On May 13, 2022, Judge Duffy-Lewis—also of the Los Angeles Superior Court—reached a similar conclusion in a second action also titled Crest v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:36 am
In upholding the tracking requirement, the focus of this post, the Court discussed the Supreme Court’s most recent major administrative search case, Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 8:52 am
Padilla I (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV27561) (Crest), Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis ruled that California Corporations Code Section 301.3 (SB 826), which requires publicly listed corporations in California to have women on their boards, violates the Equal Protection Clause of California’s Constitution. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am
Here is the author’s article. *************** On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 6:53 am
Promotion of “Underrepresented Communities” Struck Down On April 1, 2022, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge granted a motion for summary judgment, filed by activist group Judicial Watch, on behalf of three California residents who took action in their capacities as taxpayers to challenge the constitutionality of AB 979. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
“I have an Article II, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President. [read post]
