Search for: "Lynch v. National Acceptance Co."
Results 1 - 20
of 57
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
The move raised privacy concerns due to the lack of an opt-out option “potentially cornering users into accepting these terms to continue using their Quest headsets. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Lynch, 576 U.S. 143, 150 (2015) (cleaned up). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Ashcroft v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I had not previously met Jeanne Sheehan Zaino or Wilfred Codrington (though I did happily blurb the book on constitutional amendment that Wilfred co-authored with John Kowal). [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:42 am
The office of Inspector General Joseph V. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:06 am
Merrill Lynch & Co., 396 F.3d 161 (2d Cir. 2005), which holds that conduct that amounts solely to misstatements and omissions cannot form the basis for scheme liability. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
”[5] At the same time, the SEC found, such disclosure would “promote the purposes of” the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), which was adopted months before President Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
The committee was told Goldy failed to disclose more than $150,000 in campaign donations, illegally accepted contributions from non-Ontarians, mixed her personal and campaign funds, and did not co-operate with the audit. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
So troubling clues existed for those with a diligent and discerning eye for numbers and financial statement footnotes, but when Merrill Lynch, among other Wall Street firms, rated Enron a strong buy in late September/early October of 2001, who really needed to look that hard? [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:20 am
The new commission is called the “National Commission on Online Child Sexual Exploitation Prevention,” but I’ll call it the “Censorship Board. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
The law requires advance notice of non-competes “no later than the time of acceptance of the offer of employment” and “independent consideration” for non-competes entered into after employment. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Appellate Division, First Department In proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel fee In Kelly G v Circe H, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2019 WL 6869009 (1stDept.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the… [read post]
Thoughts on the SG’s “Lesbian Comparator” Argument in the Pending Title VII Sexual-Orientation Cases
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
Clayton County, Georgia, No. 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
Where past lawmakers enacted their prejudices into law, we sometimes have to accept the result, even if we do not like it. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
Ellis v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
CalPERS appealed, asserting that its individual suit was timely because the three-year time limit was subject to equitable tolling pursuant to American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
This objection is mostly misguided.In the 2005 case of Gonzales v. [read post]
