Search for: "M. O. L." Results 1 - 20 of 11,952
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 12:27 am by JR Chaves
En esta valoración probatoria resulta perfectamente ajustado a derecho tomar en consideración si el representante de la Administración realizó o no una tacha del perito, o si aportó o no pruebas en contrario. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:17 am by JR Chaves
Uno de los terrenos más quebradizos pero más maravillosos de la prueba es la llamada “prueba indiciaria”. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:57 pm by gA
Lo que realmente ha cambiado no es que ahora tengamos una Corte que de repente se muestre imperial, arbitraria o politizada. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:22 am by JR Chaves
Y tampoco cuando asume la prestación directa del servicio, o cuando celebra un convenio con una entidad local o, en fin, cuando materializa su actividad de cooperación técnica o económica de cualquier forma no contractual. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Assen KoevThe resolution of many securities class action lawsuits would benefit from an economic assessment early in the case process. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2024, 10:14 am by Yosi Yahoudai
  Acusar a los ciudadanos judíos de ser más leales a Israel, o a las supuestas prioridades de los judíos mundialmente, que a los intereses de sus propias naciones. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]