Search for: "M.J. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,398
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
” See United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 2:08 pm
That was our experience as appellate military defense counsel in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:51 pm
All of this is a wind-up to say that, last week, the Maryland Supreme Court ruled on both questions in considerable detail in an important new case, State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 8:13 am
Williams, 50 M.J. 436 (C.A.A.F. 1999); United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
") (Koppe, M.J.); United States v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 3:00 am
” This rule was applied in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
., Koch, A.G. and Møgelmose, V., 2022. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 11:45 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 7:47 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:06 am
Erikson, 65 M.J. 221 (CA.A.F. 2007); United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 8:47 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 12:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 9:31 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 6:24 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Anyone wishing to review a copy of this Order and Decision by the United States Magistrate Judge Joseph F. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
