Search for: "MARCUS v. MARCUS"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:57 am
After 23 petitions for certiorari, the Court finally granted Ramos v. [read post]
“The strange case of Alito v. Alito; Alito-gate: The justice, his wife, her flags and their ethics.”
29 May 2024, 6:55 pm
“The strange case of Alito v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
24 May 2024, 8:00 am
”In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:38 pm
R. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:41 pm
Marcus Odom, No. 23-6105 (2d Cir. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division (EEOC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am
Marcus Smith J set the terms of an annual global licence of $25.65 million plus $30 million for a 6-year past release - many orders of magnitude lower than Optis' sought. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northen District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In addition to the $50,000 payment to the impacted individual, the company has agreed to post appropriate notices and to modify its training and employment related practices particularly as they relate to sex-based discrimination and retaliation.In a written statement, Regional Attorney for the EEOC's Atlanta District Office Marcus G. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:13 am
The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment (Smith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Written by Mark V. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 3:43 am
ECOWASThe Incorporated Trustees of Expression Now Human Rights Initiative v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
Let's Just Cut to the Chase, Please GUEST POST BY MICHAEL CARUSO Yesterday, the 11th Circuit decided U.S. v. [read post]
