Search for: "MARCUS v. MARCUS" Results 1 - 20 of 1,168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
29 May 2024, 8:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division (EEOC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Marcus Smith J set the terms of an annual global licence of $25.65 million plus $30 million for a 6-year past release - many orders of magnitude lower than Optis' sought. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northen District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In addition to the $50,000 payment to the impacted individual, the company has agreed to post appropriate notices and to modify its training and employment related practices particularly as they relate to sex-based discrimination and retaliation.In a written statement, Regional Attorney for the EEOC's Atlanta District Office Marcus G. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 10:13 am by Levin Papantonio
The Mississippi Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment (Smith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Henry P Yang
While the readers may remember that in InterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat) Mellor J adopted an exclusionary approach with comparables, disregarding most and eventually relied on a single prior licence LG 2017 to derive all the rates in that Judgment, Marcus Smith J differed from that approach and considered that at least in this case, the comparables only have value if an inclusive approach is taken. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 3:43 am by INFORRM
ECOWASThe Incorporated Trustees of Expression Now Human Rights Initiative v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm by David Oscar Markus
Let's Just Cut to the Chase, Please GUEST POST BY MICHAEL CARUSO Yesterday, the 11th Circuit decided U.S. v. [read post]