Search for: "MARTIN v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 1 - 20 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2024, 11:28 am by Ilya Somin
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, the court heard the defendant’s application to strike out the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited KB-2023-003818. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In a recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision, an employee commenced a wrongful dismissal claim against his former employer in the Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
In a recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision, an employee commenced a wrongful dismissal claim against his former employer in the Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
Which court hears the removal case and under what procedures? [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:28 am by Stuart Tubis
Zarco Hotels Inc., Case No. 22STCV07447 (Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles) You can download a copy of the Court’s Order here. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Secondly: in the second part of the decision in Khan, the Court of Appeal resolved the tension between Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) and John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock, 17 October 2019 (His Honour Judge Martin Rodger KC), unreported. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]