Search for: "MARYLAND FOR THE USE OF LEVIN v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
In 1984, the Supreme Court created a now well-known “good faith” exception to the exclusionary rule in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:04 am
The case, Levin v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Ever since Roe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 9:19 am
In 2009, the United States Supreme Court handed down a seminal decision regarding the liability of drug manufacturers for failure to adequately warn of the risks associated with using a particular drug. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:17 am
United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Maryland law); Moscinski v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Levine. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
Maryland and DeWeese v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:36 am
Levine did not change the analysis either, because “[a]lthough preemption principles do not foreclose state-law failure-to-warn claims once the FDA has approved a drug, Michigan law does so. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) … [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Case Law: R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police: The use of facial recognition software by the police is lawful – Suneet Sharma. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm
The plaintiff lost at trial, proving that at least sometimes juries have more sense than judges.On the good side of the ledger, Maryland’s highest court agreed, in University of Maryland Medical System Corp. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
