Search for: "MATTER OF B L O" Results 1 - 20 of 1,108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
‘Now is the time to reassess presumption of parental involvement’, writes Lea Levine in the April issue of the journal[1]. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:11 pm by Dennis Crouch
Daniel Kazhdan, Obviousness-Type Double Patenting: Why It Exists and When It Applies, 53 AKRON L. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
O’Barr, and Robin Conley RinerWhile our collection suffers from a lack of diverse voices on legal writing, Point Made and Point Taken highlight the legal writing of a wide spectrum of advocates and judges and are two of our most popular writing guidesLegal Drafting in a Nutshell (2021) by George W. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
After all, the legal framework of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 11 of the Securities Act is over 90 years old. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
(Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Mexico’s president, is sympathetic to Mr Glas’s party.) [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 12:16 pm by Russell Knight
Normally, Promises Don’t Matter In An Illinois Divorce The relief granted by the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act is so broad and flexible that there’s usually no need to outline a divorcing party’s promise and failure to fulfill that promise. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
—, 144 S.Ct. 756 (March 15, 2024), considered with a companion case O’Connor-Radcliffe v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:33 pm by Administrator
That is a matter for the board. [42] This proceeding was brought by the condominium corporation under s. 134 of the Condominium Act, 1998. [read post]