Search for: "MATTER OF L E B" Results 1 - 20 of 2,124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
Signature on the Saint-Laurent Group, 2024 QCCA 538 [15] Selon l’appelant, le juge a fait exactement ce qu’il avait précédemment et correctement annoncé qu’il se garderait de faire, soit interpréter à ce stade du dossier la portée du S.A., question qui est au cœur du litige. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
With a List of Suggested Resources**On June 4, 2020 the Washington Supreme Court issued an open letter to the judiciary and legal community recognizing deep-seated and continuing institutional racial injustice and calling for action to address systemic inequities. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
The court held that the natural and ordinary meaning of the words complained of was: “There were strong grounds to suspect that the claimant a) was run by a disqualified director guilty of VAT evasion and its directors were a front for him; b) was involved in furlough fraud, money laundering and misuse of “Bounce Back” and “Funding Circle” loans; and c) took advantage of staff by forcing them into arrangements involving the use and establishment of… [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
(Editor’s Note: This article is part of our new symposium on the ICC and Israel-Hamas war.) [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
After all, the legal framework of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 11 of the Securities Act is over 90 years old. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Meetings of the IRC are not open to the public and members are not considered public officers for purposes of the Public Officers Law (see Executive Law § 94 [3] [k]-[l]). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  “[L]ocal school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained [there]in …” (Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  “[L]ocal school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained [there]in …” (Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:05 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Permanent authorization of E-Verify and a requirement that it become mandatory for all employers (with a likely phase-in period based on employer size). [read post]