Search for: "MATTER OF McCOMBS"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Generally, the relationship has been judicially defined as a matter of “economic reality”—whether, based on the totality of the relationship, “the worker is economically dependent on the employer to work (thus, an employee) or is in a business for themselves (and is thus an independent contractor). [read post]
28 May 2023, 3:05 pm
Co., 527 F.2d 1308 (5th Cir. 1976), the controlling factor whether a person is an employee or independent contractor is whether, “as a matter of economic reality,” a worker is “dependent upon the business to which they render service. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
As a practical matter, the distinction between rescheduling and relisting is great. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:17 am
The Court of Appeal (Lord Justice McCombe, Lord Justice Underhill and Lord Justice Arnold) affirmed this decision by a majority, with Lord Justice Arnold dissenting on both grounds. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
At this Friday’s conference, the Supreme Court will vote to grant the last cases that will be argued this term (barring expedited briefing on some emergency matter). [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:22 am
They were raised by women who, no matter how wonderful, didn't know how to convey "the distinctive male mode of feeling. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2021] EWCA Civ 18 (heard 16 December 2020 by Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ and Sir Richard McCombe). [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 4:38 pm
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a piece “The EU/UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement: Digital Trade”. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Rather than file a response to Giustra’s claim, Twitter sought to have the matter dismissed out of B.C. courts, arguing that California, where Twitter has its headquarters, would be the correct jurisdiction but its arguments were rejected. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 16 December 2020 (McCombe, Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ). [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
(“Tagnetics”) in civil contempt of this court’s Order Granting in Part Tagnetics’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 101) and Ordering Other Matters entered on October 25, 2019 (doc. 119) (the “Settlement Enforcement Order”). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
The judgment in the Court of Appeal was given by Nicola Davies LJ, with whom McCombe and Coulson LJJ agreed. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 4:14 pm
So contentious in fact that at one point in the proceedings, the judge entered an order prohibiting McCombs “from filing any pleadings in this matter without first seeking leave of court [ ] to do so. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:43 am
McComb, 331 U.S. 722, 730 (1947). [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:12 am
But civility isn’t just a matter of not calling jerks “jerks. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
As already mentioned, on 17 May 2019, the Court of Appeal (Lewison, McCombe and Haddon-Cave LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 852 (heard 5 March 2019). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
The set of conflicting outcomes plainly makes no sense, neither as a matter of logic nor for the sake of justice or efficiency. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 8:01 am
The decision of a Minister on a matter of national policy will engage very different considerations from that of a local authority official considering whether or not to take any particular step in ongoing proceedings seeking to recover possession of a unit of social housing. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:05 am
For that matter, who cares what he finds “sickening”? [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:00 am
We have locations in New Jersey and Philadelphia for all your personal injury legal matters. [read post]
