Search for: "MATTER OF N C F"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
C. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
These include (i) the treatment of foreign summary enforcement judgments as ordinary “enforceable titles” (sanadat tanfidhiyya – titres exécutoires) under domestic law including domestic judgments rendered in criminal matters; (ii) the assimilation between summary judgment in common law jurisdictions and hukm musta’jil (“summary interlocutory proceedings order” – “jugement en référé”); and (iii) the… [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm
A full funding proposal can be presented upon request" (Concept Note n. 1). [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
[C.] [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 am
The Court explained that “[i]f the statutory castle doctrine applies, it disclaims the elements of lying in wait and displaces that offense. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
For instance, the federal courthouse in Dallas is located at 1100 Commerce Street, while the state courthouses (there are two) are found at 133 N. [read post]
18 May 2024, 11:49 am
Pix credit hereFor those who may have missed this, οn 8 May 2024, National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) from all regions gathered in Geneva for the Annual Conference of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), on the role and experiences of NHRIs in addressing Business and Human Rights (BHR), at which they adopted the GANHRI Statement (8 May 2024): Business and Human Rights: The Role and Experiences of NHRI's. [read post]
16 May 2024, 10:30 pm
C-567/13 Baczó and Vizsnyiczai, paras 40-42; C-377/14Radlinger and Radlingerová, para. 48), in the absence of EU rules governing the matter, it is for the domestic legal system of each Member State, in accordance with the principle of procedural autonomy, to designate the courts and tribunals having jurisdiction and to lay down the detailed procedural rules governing actions for safeguarding rights which individuals derive from EU law. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 748 F.3d 120, 124 n.3 (2d Cir. 2014) (collecting cases). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This statute is written in a cumbersome matter which largely describes what the statute does not allow. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
§ 504(a)-(c). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The committee was composed of the director of curriculum, instruction, and educational services; high school principal; junior high school principal; library media specialist; chair of the English department; and a “[p]rocess [c]onsultant. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The committee was composed of the director of curriculum, instruction, and educational services; high school principal; junior high school principal; library media specialist; chair of the English department; and a “[p]rocess [c]onsultant. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Ezekiel Dixon-RomÁn and Dr. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Ezekiel Dixon-RomÁn and Dr. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
Instead, the court will tell the jury that Doe's claims succeed as a matter of law and that the jury may not revisit that issue. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
Instead, the court will tell the jury that Doe's claims succeed as a matter of law and that the jury may not revisit that issue. [read post]
