Search for: "MATTER OF P S"
Results 1 - 20
of 18,747
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
Nate Persily is one of our nation’s leading election law scholars (and a friend), with whom I usually agree on many specific matters in our field, but he is quoted today in the N.Y. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 5:59 am
” This conclusion finds additional support in the chapter on countermeasures, where Austria asserts that [p]reventive cyber measures, prior to the commission of an internationally wrongful act conducted by or attributable to a state, such as exploiting vulnerabilities in other states’ ICT networks and placing “logic bombs” therein, cannot be justified under the law of state responsibility. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 3:27 pm
Why it matters: The House Freedom Caucus chair is tapping… Continue reading The post “GOP colleagues sneer at Rep. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Although the letter did not specify claimant's rate of pay, such rate was governed by the existing contract ($166.67/day), and claimant was expressly advised that the employer anticipated that "there [would] be as much day-to-day work for [s]ubstitute [p]araprofessionals during the 2021-2022 [s]chool [y]ear, as was available in the 2020-2021 [s]chool [y]ear. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Although the letter did not specify claimant's rate of pay, such rate was governed by the existing contract ($166.67/day), and claimant was expressly advised that the employer anticipated that "there [would] be as much day-to-day work for [s]ubstitute [p]araprofessionals during the 2021-2022 [s]chool [y]ear, as was available in the 2020-2021 [s]chool [y]ear. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
Similarly, the claim did not amount to Jameel abuse as the allegations published in the Home Office Report were very serious and their effect on the claimant’s reputation was held to be a matter for trial. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:21 am
” (p. 4) . . . [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Sanders & Sanders, Cheektowaga (Harvey P. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Sanders & Sanders, Cheektowaga (Harvey P. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:30 am
” (P. 182.) [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 1:00 am
Abbott’s request for an information type remedy was rejected as the Court held that there was insufficient interest in it and since Sibio’s declaration already provides for it. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 12:35 am
This would mean that the EUIPO’s appeal in APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P, see also here) would be successful, as in that case, the GC had – surprisingly – considered that what mattered was the date of application of the opposed EUTM. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 9:41 am
Boston law firm Parker Scheer LLP announces that Lawrence “Lonnie” P. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
Here, defendant failed to make a motion before the district court, and “[p]er North Carolina law . . . for a defendant to properly object to a trial by citation, [they] must make such objection before the court of original jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 6:21 am
Now, he’s trying something new. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 5:06 am
Images of the building encased in dark smoke swept across social media, gaining such traction that the stock market dipped, with the S&P 500 dropping briefly as the public processed the possibility of an attack on the Department of Defense. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:20 am
by Leslie P. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
These videos did not appear to the trial judge to contain any evidence that would change any of the medical experts’ conclusions drawn from the remainder of the evidence, but because a judge may not substitute his or her lay opinion for matters requiring expert testimony, the videos were shown to all of the medical evaluators to obtain their perspective. [read post]
