Search for: "MATTER OF R T" Results 1 - 20 of 53,750
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am by Frank Cranmer
By tradition, they do not do so, although the decision is a matter for each individual. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Michelle
Senators Ted Budd (R-NC), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Steve Daines (R-MT), Bill Hagerty (R-TN) and Katie Britt (R-AL) cosponsored the bill on Tuesday, pointing in a press release to negative repercussions for consumers since the initial cap was introduced in 2011. [read post]
 The Court rejected Sibio’s arguments on this point, finding that the conditions for a PI as per R. 211 RoP were met. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 11:52 am by John Holtz
Furthermore, the contracting officer for a matter can even determine that for that specific procurement that the item in question isn’t really available in the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Campaign committee for Congressman Steve King (R-IA), tweets out an image of "Success Kid" with the message "FUND OUR MEMES!!! [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:23 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Those who don't feel like meeting the public’s demand for more humane treatment of farm animals are fighting Proposition 12 every way they can. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:20 am by Vann Attorneys PLLC
Call us today to discuss your matter.(919) 510-8585Our Happy Clients “We have had a very good experience thus far. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 10:46 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
The Biden administration is weighing actions that would target high-tech chip architecture known as gate all-around, Bloomberg reported, citing sources familiar with the matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
Finally, the Federal Circuit notes that “[b]ecause ‘encrypted communications’ and ‘program code’ are not being claimed here for the content they communication, they are not printed matter,” and thus, “[t]he inquiry stops there; if the claim element is not printed matter, we need not consider whether it has a functional or structural relation to its substrate. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
The new statutory presumption didn’t say how much contact should happen, in fact it didn’t even mention ‘contact’, preferring instead the very flexible concept of ‘involvement’, which could embrace direct or indirect contact or even potentially involvement in decision making without any contact at all (i.e. the grant or exercise of PR). [read post]