Search for: "MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. King"
Results 1 - 20
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Rosa v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys. 2024 NY Slip Op 02538 Decided on May 8, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am
But a recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Kordonsky v Brudoley, Decision and Order [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 26, 2024]), highlights some of the shortcomings of the intervention procedure for unnamed owners in derivative cases. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
Such hearings are serious matters in Michigan and should not be viewed as trivial. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am
In Mrkulic v Peters 2023 NY Slip Op 33930(U) November 2, 2023Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 505025/2020Judge Debra Silber points out a vast number of errors that took place before she was assigned to the case. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
The court did, however, deny review in one case that had been relisted three times – King v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
King v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, (Kings Cty NY Sup. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Following administrative review, PERB concluded that it was constrained to follow Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Following administrative review, PERB concluded that it was constrained to follow Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, LLP, 188 AD3d 530, 531 [1st Dept 2020], quoting McCoy, 99 NY2d at 301, citing King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
United States, 140 S. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
It bears emphasizing that the reason the 7-22 ILC Class must be designated as a separate class is because previous cohorts of the ILC consistently took a different view of international law on the matter. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 6:33 pm
” People v Norman, 2004 NY Slip Op 51851(U). [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
“Failing to pay tax liabilities is corporate mismanagement,” ruled the Court in Fernandes v Matrix Model Staffing, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 31317(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2022]), “which defeats a petitioner’s reasonable expectations sufficient to constitute oppression” under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law (the “BCL”). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 4:52 am
In Doeblin v MacArthur (2023 NY Slip Op 30133(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2023]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrea J. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Samsung, 971 F.2d 1395, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992)) New York only has one system of Right of Publicity law.[5][6] The NY statutory regime supports a right of publicity, yet the New York Court of Appeals has held that there is no common law right of publicity in Stephano v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
Samsung, 971 F.2d 1395, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992)) New York only has one system of Right of Publicity law.[5][6] The NY statutory regime supports a right of publicity, yet the New York Court of Appeals has held that there is no common law right of publicity in Stephano v. [read post]
