Search for: "MGN"
Results 1 - 20
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2011, 1:45 am
The judgment comes some six years after MGN (Mirror Group Newspapers) first applied [...] [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:05 pm
On 7 August 2015, Kitchin LJ granted MGN permission to appeal against the privacy damages decision of Mann J in the case of Gulati v MGN ([2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch)). [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 10:38 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in BNM v MGN Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1767 manages to be both very important and a massive anti-climax. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 9:53 pm
Our latest Costs Law Update on the important decision in BNM v MGN Limited [2016] EWHC B13 (Costs), where a “reasonable” bill was “slashed” by 50% on the basis of the new proportionality test is now available. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm
MGN will now seek permission from the Court of Appeal. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
And then there was the decision in MGN v UK. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
MGN challenges the decision in Campbell v MGN (No.2) [2005] 1 WLR 3394. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
” Mr Sherborne said that MGN had admitted that all the representative claimants were victims of voicemail interception. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Ex parte MGN Ltd and others [2011] WLR (D) 17 “It was rarely appropriate to impose blanket reporting restrictions under section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 for the purpose of ameliorating the disadvantages of giving evidence and minimising the burdens faced by witnesses in criminal trials. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am
Finally, some vindication for MGN nearly 10 years after the publication of its original article. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am
Judgment in the case of KC v MGN Ltd ([2012] EWHC 483 (QB)) was handed down on 5 March 2012. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:29 am
MGN challenged the decision in Campbell v MGN (No.2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3394) on Article 10 grounds. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:56 pm
Reference was made to John v MGN, Thompson v Commissioner of Police and Vento v Chief Constable. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 7:46 am
MGN sought permission to appeal (see our post here). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:54 am
eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10); [2011] WLR (D) 330 “Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an action either before the courts of the member state in which the publisher of that content was established or before the… [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:28 pm
On 18 January 2011 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights handed down its long awaited judgment in the case of MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04 [2011] ECHR 66). [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:05 pm
In February 2013, MGN applied to strike these claims out and/or for summary judgment. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 2:31 am
He noted that “one facet of the public interest can be correcting a false image, referring to the PCC Code and to Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457 [65]. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 5:47 am
A number of other claims against MGN are continuing. [read post]
