Search for: "MOORE v. CRAFT"
Results 1 - 20
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:36 am
Dinwoodie is a partner in the law firm of Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (“Cravath”). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 11:36 pm
Landmark Decision Upholds Validity of Prenuptial Agreements in Recent UK Case Law In the recent case of MN v AN [2023] EWHC 613 (Fam), Mr Justice Moor delivered a judgment that reinforces the English court’s commitment to upholding valid prenuptial agreements. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:15 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:23 am
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:15 am
See Shoop v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 6:17 pm
Moore v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:32 am
For example, a 2015 Supreme Court case, Yates v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Given Article V’s requirement that lawmakers corral supermajority support at two stages, leading scholars contend that America’s is perhaps the world’s most difficult constitution to alter. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 4:08 pm
Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation to discuss the specifics of your case and craft a formidable defence. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
Pepper v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
"Allowing different remedies in state law cases heard in federal courts on pendent jurisdiction would undermine the 'twin aims of the Erie rule: discouragement of forum-shopping and avoidance of inequitable administration of the laws.'" LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Cover’s insights suggests both the power and permanence of these nomic contests within an international law that has at once lost its moorings in public law but is building new foundations of authority and action interlinked with but distinct from public law. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
"Allowing different remedies in state law cases heard in federal courts on pendent jurisdiction would undermine the 'twin aims of the Erie rule: discouragement of forum-shopping and avoidance of inequitable administration of the laws.'" LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 10:47 am
See State v. [read post]
