Search for: "Macintosh v. Macintosh"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
For example, a few journalists completely blew NFIB v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 4:36 am
The CAD industry was booming at the time, and even though the “desktop” market was dominated by Apple’s Macintosh and Xerox’s Star, the computer-aided design (CAD) market was predicted to exceed $7 billion by the end of the decade. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:27 am
The applicant’s 120 revocation actions against a broad range of marks with genuine use, such as MACINTOSH and BEATMEISTER, signalled a lack of legitimate and acceptable business practice, creating parallel time limits that are unreasonable for the proprietor to adhere to. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
(Trustee of) v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:37 pm
See, Athey v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:05 pm
(R. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
And courts and the USPTO have occasionally applied public use doctrine to find that the widespread use of a mark by the public, like “Coke” for Coca-Cola, “Mac” for Macintosh computers, or “the Evil Empire” for the Yankees, can give rise to protectable trademark rights or at least provide adequate foundation to prevent a competitor from making use of a confusingly similar term. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
Canada’s Supreme Court orders Google to de-index unlawful websites globally https://t.co/sgFzLv3CUj -> National Courts and the Future of the Internet: Google Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:15 am
Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-07-17 https://t.co/39jSZWEH6Y -> Copyright infringement found in Royal Conservatory of Music v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:10 am
IPOS (Intellectual Property Office of Singapore) Express: * Case Summary – Bigfoot Internet Ventures Pte Ltd v Apple Inc.Bigfoot Internet Ventures had put up an application for revocation of a trade mark “SHERLOCK” (referred to as the “Mark”) registered in the name of Apple Inc., claiming it was not put to use in Singapore for five years.Sherlock was a software application integrated into version 8.5 of the Macintosh computer operating… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 12:33 pm
(See Wipfli v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
Court rules Canadian business infringed U.S. trademark law https://t.co/0WzNRpdYSc -> Ninth Circuit Criticizes Attempts to Plead Around Secton 230–Kimzey v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:33 am
9 and 10 in Clements v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 2:40 am
The whole Oracle v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 12:38 pm
In today’s case (Gill v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:28 pm
In this week’s case (Graham v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:12 am
In the recent case (MacIntosh v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:34 am
; Tweten v. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 7:17 am
Part V, we explained why that blog was on our blogroll: China Economics Blog. [read post]
