Search for: "Madrid v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 285
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2021, 10:08 am
The Supreme Court of the United States recently issued an opinion in Torres v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 8:30 am
It is still up to the designated Member State of the Madrid Protocol and its national law whether it will accept sound, motion or multimedia marks. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 1:48 pm
Today, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Torres v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:05 am
Madrid rode home from work. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 9:34 am
Further, member states of the Madrid Protocol can delay the effectiveness by notifying WIPO and there is no ultimate deadline (Rule 40(8) Regulations). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Madrid. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:18 am
Seacrets, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:25 am
Lodestar Anstalt v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 9:00 am
Madrid and Pereida v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Case date: 21 April 2022 Case number: No. 19-55864 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Here's the abstract:In its judgment of 3 February 2012 in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy: Greece intervening), the International Court of Justice has considered the relationship between jus cogens and the rule of State immunity. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:02 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Instead of the state map let's use a city or a county map. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
The application for the FISC order was personally approved by John Ashcroft, then the Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:08 am
Madrid Pereida v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Discussion The basic test for identifying a Fourth Amendment seizure comes from Justice Potter Stewart’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:56 am
While this Kat was taking part to the outstanding EIPIN congress in Alicante, he became aware of the fresh decision by the Madrid Court of Appeal in YouTube v Telecinco of 14 January 2014 [Madrid Court of Appeal decision No 11/2014, available here; non-official English translation kindly provided by the Kat-friend Carolina Pina (Garrigues Madrid) available here; the IPKat's note on the first instance decision here]. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 6:14 am
The appeals court, however, said the lower court erred in not considering a 2008 amendment to the Americans With Disabilities Act that may protect the child from discrimination.The opinion in Knudsen v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
