Search for: "Main V. Main" Results 1 - 20 of 16,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 5:33 am by Nedim Malovic
Last month, I had the opportunity and privilege to speak at the EUIPO Case Law Conference 2024 and present the challenges of trademark modernization, under the heading “Reconciling the Old with the New: Challenges of Trade Mark Modernization” [see IPKat here].In this post, I would like to discuss the main conclusion that I reached after reviewing case law of the EUIPO issued over the period 2022 – 2023. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
Querino v Cambridge City Council (Rev1) (2024) EWCA Civ 314 We’re a bit late to this one. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:30 am by Neil Siegel
One main reason that the Constitution is too difficult to amend, Chapter 10 argues, is that Article V essentially lets states vote twice. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent during the argued commission of the… [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Jonathan Santman (Brinkhof)
The court dismisses this request because it regards R. 158 RoP only applicable in main proceedings. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 2:51 am by SHG
So it was at UCLA, as reflected in the complaint in Frankel v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
The main defense arguments against allowing  rap lyrics in criminal trials as evidence are: First Amendment Violation: Young Thug’s lawyers argue that using his lyrics as evidence violates his First Amendment right to free speech and artistic expression. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
The main defense arguments against allowing  rap lyrics in criminal trials as evidence are: First Amendment Violation: Young Thug’s lawyers argue that using his lyrics as evidence violates his First Amendment right to free speech and artistic expression. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
The main defense arguments against allowing  rap lyrics in criminal trials as evidence are: First Amendment Violation: Young Thug’s lawyers argue that using his lyrics as evidence violates his First Amendment right to free speech and artistic expression. [read post]