Search for: "Marbury v. Marbury" Results 1 - 20 of 906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2024, 12:44 pm by Guest Author
The plurality in that case maintained the usual distinction between law and merits, and preferred to rest its view on the older proposition in Marbury v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
It concluded that the “separation of powers doctrine, as expounded in Marbury v. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 11:04 am by becassidy
Notable excerpts include the Chinese Code of T’ang (600), the Magna Carta (1240), the Iroquois Nations’ Book of the Great Law (1450), Marbury v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The rest of constitutional history consists of small patches of largely open space dotted with Marbury, McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
During the first week of constitutional law as conventionally taught in most American law schools (and as I teach it), students learn that, in the words of Chief Justice John Marshall speaking for the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 11:01 am by Kevin LaCroix
  That is straight from the foundational case of Marbury v. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
This retrieval makes use of the act/potency distinction from Scholastic philosophy, Thomas Aquinas’s distinction between ius and lex, and John Marshall’s canonical account of the judicial application of the Constitution as a rule of decision in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 8:20 am by William Sinclair and Todd Hesel
In addition to the language in the APA, Chief Justice Roberts justified the holding by empathizing the constitutional principle articulated in Marbury v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
(Sunstein, 23) There is no set list of canonical cases, but other candidates for the constitutional canon include Marbury v. [read post]
In a 6-3 majority opinion written by Chief Justice Roberts, the Court rejected Chevron as inconsistent with the vision of the Founders and the imperative expressed in Marbury v. [read post]