Search for: "Marie Gryphon"
Results 1 - 20
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 9:37 am
If you haven’t yet caught up with the furor, some places to start are (besides the earlier-linked Jonathan Adler, Don Boudreaux and Steve Chapman) David Boaz, the Charles Koch Foundation’s side, Alison Frankel/Reuters, Marie Gryphon, Trevor Burrus, Brink Lindsay, and Julian Sanchez. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:23 am
[Rebecca Greenfield, Atlantic Wire] More: Ted Frank, Point of Law (who represents objector Marie Gryphon in the case). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:35 pm
” SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro described Kotz as a “committed public servant who has served the agency with great distinction for the past four years. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:10 am
The article cites Marie's advocacy for the development of a litigation insurance system: Marie Gryphon of the Manhattan Institute, a centre-right think-tank, who is author of a loser-pays proposal, says that Texas got "much less than half a loaf", and that Florida was spooked too quickly. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:20 pm
Brown Panel 4: Restoring the Mens Rea Requirement Playing With The Rules: An Effort to Strengthen the Mens Rea Standards of Federal Criminal Laws Geraldine Szott Mohr Remarks on Restoring the Mens Rea Requirement Harvey Silvergate The Better Part of Lenity Marie Gryphon Developing Consensus Solutions to Overcriminalization Problems: The Way Ahead Jeffrey S. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:57 am
MI's Marie Gryphon reviews Snigda Prakash's All the Justice Money Can Buy in the latest issue of Barron's. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:57 am
Brown Playing With The Rules: An Effort to Strengthen the Mens Rea Standards of Federal Criminal Laws Geraldine Szott Moohr Remarks on Restoring the Mens Rea Requirement Harvey Silvergate The Better Part of Lenity Marie Gryphon Developing Consensus Solutions to Overcriminalization Problems: The Way Ahead Jeffrey S. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:41 am
“Woman Sues Adidas After Fall She Blames on Sticky Shoes” [Lowering the Bar] Texas lawmakers file loser pays proposals [SE Tex Record] Actual scope of proposals hard to discern through funhouse lens of NYT reporting [PoL] Marie Gryphon testimony on loser-pays proposals in Arkansas [Manhattan Institute, related] Google awarded patent on changing of logo for special days [Engadget via Coyote] “Civil Gideon in Deadbeat Dad Cases Would Be ‘Massive’… [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:15 am
Thursday, MI's Marie Gryphon testified in Little Rock, Arkansas on behalf of a loser-pays bill being considered there. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
Gryphon. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:59 am
“Mark Lanier, Marie Gryphon and Ted Frank debate if a free market can protect consumers as well as lawyers. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 8:01 am
MI's Marie Gryphon: Congress shouldn't force citizens to fly blind. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:24 am
27 Sep 2010, 5:29 am
As our regular readers know, we tend to be skeptical; see Ted's article here; my op-ed here; and Marie Gryphon's writings here, here, and here. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:59 am
The odd thing about Mark Lanier endorsing "loser pays" on "Stossel" is that he took the opposite position when the Wall Street Journal covered Marie Gryphon's paper last year. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:04 am
This "dollar auction" aspect of litigation deserves more thought, but I offer it to Marie Gryphon as a paper idea for another reason why loser-pays would prevent socially inefficient litigation at the margin. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:08 am
This week's edition of "Stossel" on Fox Business News features Marie Gryphon talking about "loser pays", me talking about class action settlements and the Center for Class Action Fairness, and both of us debating the issue (and the Vioxx case!) [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 4:44 am
…will be taking on class action lawyers tonight, with guests that include Ted Frank, Texas lawyer Mark Lanier, and Marie Gryphon of the Manhattan Institute [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:57 am
Marie Gryphon has this piece in the National Law Journal refuting the common misconceptions that "criminal defendants can't get a break from conservative judges" or that "Republican appointees decide criminal cases based on the identity of the parties rather than the content of the law. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
[Josh Gerstein, Politico] Related: if you think conservative Justices on the Supreme Court are adamant against overturning criminal convictions, think again [Marie Gryphon, National Law Journal] Tags: crime and punishment, Supreme Court Related posts Update: Animal rights vs. free speech (1) May 18 roundup (5) “These men are remarkably sophisticated consumers of legal talent” (0) Yet more Edwards campaign-cash laundering (0) Wyeth v. [read post]
