Search for: "Mark A. Lemley"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,214
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 3:30 am
Gugliuzza & Mark A. [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:35 am
On FB, Mark Lemley and Kate Litvak brought to my attention this Bloomberg story; an excerpt: Top law firms are rushing to target new recruits,... [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:30 am
Mark A. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
Mark Lemley observed this nearly twenty years ago, but if you allow private parties to define property rights through contracts, it takes the job of defining property out of the hands of the law and subject to the whims of the preferences of private parties. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:55 am
Mark A. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:33 pm
Feder and Lee, Katherine and Grimmelmann, James and Grimmelmann, James and Daphne Ippolito, Daphne Ippolito and Callison-Burch, Christopher and Choquette-Choo, Christopher A. and Mireshghallah, Niloofar and Brundage, Miles and Mimno, David and Choksi, Madiha Zahrah and Balkin, Jack M. and Carlini, Nicholas and De Sa, Christopher and Frankle, Jonathan and Ganguli, Deep and Gipson, Bryant and Guadamuz, Andres and Harris, Swee Leng and Jacobs, Abigail and Joh, Elizabeth E. and Kamath, Gautam and… [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from professors Mark A. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm
Not that surprising that the luxury marks are not selling on these platforms and are often fighting them; luxury may require keeping the mark with the brand. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
” Mark Lemley Agencies in TM law: PTO is sort of a black box b/c ignored TM so long on the policy side. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Citing both Dogan/Lemley and Dinwoodie/Janis is a good example: those articles don’t say the same thing. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:20 am
Mark Lemley (now of Stanford Law), which is still going strong). [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am
Mark Lemley argues that Federal Circuit’s obviousness standard (known here as the Rosen-Durling test) makes it too difficult to actual reject or cancel design patent claims. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 8:07 pm
Lemley would throughout this approach entirely. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Are they having trouble clearing marks? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Lemley/Tushnet discuss some possibilities. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Mark Lemley: a surprising number of your examples involved women. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
Mark Lemley and Bryan Casey's article argues that AI training is generally "fair learning," but that some outputs may infringe, such as wholesale copying that competes with the copyright owner's "core market. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:01 am
Amicus Curiae Professors represented by Jacob Sherkow, University of Illinois and Mark Lemley, Stanford University Amicus Curiae American Intellectual Property Law Association represented by Barbara A. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Stanford Law Professor Mark Lemley has likewise argued for fair use protection for generative AI. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:09 am
Oral arguments will include the 11 Federal Circuit judges (absent Judge Newman) along with Mark Lemley (for the accused infringer); Joe Herriges (for the patentee GM); and USPTO Acting Solicitor Farheena Rasheed (for amicus USPTO). [read post]
